(SS) Casillas De Magana v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 29, 20241:21-cv-01288California11,330 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IRMA CASILLAS DE MAGANA, Case No. 1:21-cv-01288-CDB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

13 v. REMANDING ACTION FOR FURTHER

PROCEEDINGS UNDER SENTENCE FOUR

14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)

SECURITY,1

15 (Doc. 14) Defendant. 16 17 18 Irma Casillas De Magana (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the 19 Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for 20 disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits under the Social Security Act. 21 (Doc. 1). The matter currently is before the Court on the certified administrative record (Doc. 10) 22 and the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. (Docs. 14, 20-21).2 23

24 1 On December 20, 2023, Martin O’Malley was named Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. See https://www.ssa.gov/history/commissioners.html. He therefore is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.