(PS) Tevis v. State of California Superior Court
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY TEVIS, et al., No. 2:23-cv-02054-TLN-CKD Plaintiffs, v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action without counsel. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c). On January 17, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which contained notice to Plaintiffs that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiffs have filed objections. (ECF No. 7.) The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the…