Lorenz

Lorenz v. Shepard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20241:23-cv-00604California2,379 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 11 ALICIA LORENZ, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-00604-JLT-EPG 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER VACATING JANUARY 9, 2024

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

13 v. 14 (ECF NO. 8)

M. SHEPARD, et al.,

15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE 16 DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE

17 (ECF Nos. 1, 8, 9). 18

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

19 THIRTY DAYS 20 21 Plaintiffs Alicia Lorenz and Patrick Lorenz, Sr. (“Plaintiffs” or “Ms. Lorenz” and “Mr. 22 Lorenz”) proceed pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed on April 19, 2023. 23 (ECF No. 1). Plaintiffs generally allege that their constitutional rights were violated when 24 Lieutenant Shepard called Ms. Lorenz’s cell phone regarding Plaintiff’s son and said Plaintiffs’ 25 son was hurt but did not give any details. 26 The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, concluding that Plaintiffs’ complaint failed to 27 state any cognizable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.