Embry

B&G Foods North America, Inc. v. Embry

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20242:20-cv-00526California3,052 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 B&G FOODS NORTH AMERICA, INC., No. 2:20-cv-0526 KJM DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER KIM EMBRY AND ENVIRONMENTAL

HEALTH ADVOCATES, INC.,

15 Defendants. 17 This matter came before the undersigned on February 23, 2024, for hearing of plaintiff’s motion to compel pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1). (ECF No. 170.) Attorneys David Kwasniewski and Chelsea Tirgardoon appeared on behalf of plaintiff. Attorney Jake Schulte appeared on behalf of defendants. Oral argument was heard, and plaintiff’s motion was taken under submission. Thereafter an order issued directing plaintiff to submit an Excel file for in camera review. (ECF No. 171.) Plaintiff submitted the file and the undersigned has reviewed it. For the reasons explained below, plaintiff’s motion to compel in camera review is granted and the motion is denied in all other respects. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is proceeding on a second amended complaint filed on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.