Embry

B&G Foods North America, Inc. v. Embry

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20242:20-cv-00526California3,052 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 B&G FOODS NORTH AMERICA, INC., No. 2:20-cv-0526 KJM DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 KIM EMBRY AND ENVIRONMENTAL

HEALTH ADVOCATES, INC.,

15 16 Defendants. 17 18 This matter came before the undersigned on February 23, 2024, for hearing of plaintiff’s 19 motion to compel pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1). (ECF No. 170.) Attorneys David 20 Kwasniewski and Chelsea Tirgardoon appeared on behalf of plaintiff. Attorney Jake Schulte 21 appeared on behalf of defendants. Oral argument was heard, and plaintiff’s motion was taken 22 under submission. Thereafter an order issued directing plaintiff to submit an Excel file for in 23 camera review. (ECF No. 171.) Plaintiff submitted the file and the undersigned has reviewed it. 24 For the reasons explained below, plaintiff’s motion to compel in camera review is granted and the 25 motion is denied in all other respects. 26 BACKGROUND 27 Plaintiff is proceeding on a second amended complaint filed on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.