(PC) Ford v. Kern Valley State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20241:23-cv-01602California382 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCEL D. FORD, No. 1:23-cv-01602-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO THIS ACTION KERN VALLEY STATE PRISON, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

Defendants. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS (ECF No. 15) 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 19, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, and found that he stated a cognizable claim for deliberate indifference against Defendant officer Fiori. (ECF No. 13.) However, Plaintiff failed to state any other cognizable claims. Plaintiff was granted the opportunity to file an amended complaint or notify the Court of his intent to proceed on the claims found to be cognizable. (Id.) On February 29, 2024, Plaintiff filed a notice of intent to 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.