(PC) Ford v. Kern Valley State Prison

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARCEL D. FORD, No. 1:23-cv-01602-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

13 v. TO THIS ACTION 14 KERN VALLEY STATE PRISON, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

15 Defendants. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS 16 (ECF No. 15) 17 18 19 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 20 U.S.C. § 1983. 21 On January 19, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, and found 22 that he stated a cognizable claim for deliberate indifference against Defendant officer Fiori. (ECF 23 No. 13.) However, Plaintiff failed to state any other cognizable claims. Plaintiff was granted the 24 opportunity to file an amended complaint or notify the Court of his intent to proceed on the 25 claims found to be cognizable. (Id.) On February 29, 2024, Plaintiff filed a notice of intent to 26 …