Ocampo

Ocampo v. Fresno Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20241:23-cv-01653California2,936 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ESTEBAN OCAMPO, No. 1:23-cv-01653-NODJ-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER TO TERMINATE FRESNO POLICE

DEPARTMENT, PACO BALDERAMA, SGT.

v. RAMON RUIZ, AND OFFICER DAVIS FROM

THE DOCKET

JOSE SANCHEZ, et al.,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

Defendants. RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (ECF No. 6) OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS 19 Plaintiff Esteban Ocampo proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 3). Plaintiff’s complaint, as amended, appears to allege that Defendant Jose Sanchez used excessive force against him in connection with Plaintiff’s arrest. On January 25, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiff’s initial complaint and concluded that 24 Plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 5).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.