Ocampo

Ocampo v. Fresno Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20241:23-cv-01653California2,936 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ESTEBAN OCAMPO, No. 1:23-cv-01653-NODJ-EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO TERMINATE FRESNO POLICE

DEPARTMENT, PACO BALDERAMA, SGT.

13 v. RAMON RUIZ, AND OFFICER DAVIS FROM

THE DOCKET

14 JOSE SANCHEZ, et al.,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

15 Defendants. RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

16 FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 17 (ECF No. 6) 18 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS 19 20 Plaintiff Esteban Ocampo proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 21 filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 3). Plaintiff’s complaint, as amended, appears to 22 allege that Defendant Jose Sanchez used excessive force against him in connection with 23 Plaintiff’s arrest. On January 25, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiff’s initial complaint and concluded that 24 Plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 5).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.