(PS) Bell v. Solano County Dept. of Health and Human Services

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CLARENCE BELL, ET AL., No. 2:22-cv-01687-TLN-CKD 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER 13 SOLANO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF

HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET

14 AL., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 18 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 19 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 2, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on the parties, and contained notice that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. The time to file objections has passed, 23 and neither party filed any objections. 24 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 25 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 26 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,…