(PS) Bell v. Solano County Dept. of Health and Human Services
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CLARENCE BELL, ET AL., No. 2:22-cv-01687-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER SOLANO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET
AL., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 2, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties, and contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. The time to file objections has passed, and neither party filed any objections. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,…