Dhillion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ARVELLO L. TUFONO, No. 2:23-cv-2691 DB P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

13 AMANDEEP DHILLION, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff, a county inmate, is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action. Plaintiff alleges 17 defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs when they failed to prescribe 18 him anti-seizure medication. Plaintiff has requested a preliminary injunction and the appointment 19 of counsel. For the reasons set forth below, this court recommends plaintiff’s motion for a 20 preliminary injunction be denied and denies plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel. 21 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 22 Plaintiff alleges he informed all defendants, who are doctors at California State Prison, 23 Sacramento (“CSP-Sac”), that he had a history of seizures but all refused to prescribe him anti- 24 seizure medication. (ECF No. 1.) As a result, plaintiff suffered seizures…