Wilson

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY LAWRENCE BARRA, Case No. 1:24-cv-00069-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW

CAUSE

13 v. (Doc. No. 7) 14 WILSON, ZIEGLER, and SCOTTI,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO DOCKET

15 Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT

16 (Doc. No. 8 at 2-4). 17 18 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s response, filed February 26, 2024 to the Court’s 19 February 8, 2024 order to show cause why Plaintiff’s Complaint should not be dismissed for 20 failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (Doc. No. 8). In his response, Plaintiff states, inter 21 alia, that, “due to extenuating circumstances and illegal search and seizures . . . I am missing 22 several of my step C responces [sic] which in regards to this case is the point of issue.” (Id. at 1). 23 Liberally construed, Plaintiff appears to contend that the grievance process was unavailable to 24 him. Plaintiff also attaches a proposed first amended complaint to his response. (Id. at 2-4). 25 Considering…