Wilson
(PC) Barra v. Wilson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY LAWRENCE BARRA, Case No. 1:24-cv-00069-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE
v. (Doc. No. 7) WILSON, ZIEGLER, and SCOTTI,
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO DOCKET
Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT
16 (Doc. No. 8 at 2-4). 17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s response, filed February 26, 2024 to the Court’s February 8, 2024 order to show cause why Plaintiff’s Complaint should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (Doc. No. 8). In his response, Plaintiff states, inter alia, that, “due to extenuating circumstances and illegal search and seizures . . . I am missing several of my step C responces [sic] which in regards to this case is the point of issue.” (Id. at 1). Liberally construed, Plaintiff appears to contend that the grievance process was unavailable to him. Plaintiff also attaches a proposed first amended complaint to his response. (Id. at 2-4). Considering…