(PS) Olson v. Hornbrook Community Services District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20242:15-cv-00646California2,988 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIMBERLY R. OLSON, No. 2:15-CV-0646-KJM-DMC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 HORNBROOK COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending on the Court’s 19 docket are a number of motions which, due to subsequent procedural history, should be 20 terminated as moot. Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions for reconsideration, Defendant 21 Gifford’s motion for finalization of a settlement agreement reached with Plaintiff, and requests to 22 set aside various defaults. 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 DISCUSSION 2 1. Pending Motions Which Have Been Rendered Moot 3 The following mooted motions remain pending: (1) the amended motion to 4 dismiss Plaintiff’s second amended complaint filed by Defendant Basic Laboratory, Inc., see ECF 5 No. 34; (2) the motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s second amended complaint filed by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.