(HC) Diaz v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20241:23-cv-01783California352 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 ANTONIO DIAZ, Case No. 1:23-cv-01783-NODJ-SKO-HC

12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION AND VACATING

13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

14 v. ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

MOTION TO AMEND PETITION TO

15 NAME A PROPER RESPONDENT

16 RYAN ANDERSON, Warden, ORDER SUBSTITUTING RYAN

ANDERSON AS RESPONDENT IN THIS

17 Respondent. MATTER

18 19 On December 29, 2023, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in this Court. 20 The Court issued an order directing Petitioner to amend the Respondent. (Doc. 4.) Petitioner was 21 granted thirty (30) days to comply with the court order, and he was advised that failure to comply 22 would result in a recommendation that the petition be dismissed. More than thirty (30) days 23 passed, and Petitioner did not comply. Therefore, on February 13, 2024, the Court issued 24 Findings and Recommendations to dismiss the petition for lack of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.