(SS) Aispuro-Crowhurst v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20242:22-cv-01850California3,540 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROSE MARINA AISPURO- No. 2:22-cv-01850-CKD

CROWHURST,

12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 14 MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of 15 Social Security, 16 Defendant. 17

18 19 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 20 (“Commissioner”) denying an application for Disability Income Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II 21 of the Social Security Act (“Act”). The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to 22 conduct all proceedings in the case, including the entry of final judgment. For the reasons 23 discussed below, the court will grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and deny the 24 Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment. 25 BACKGROUND 26 Plaintiff, born in 1962, applied on January 3, 2020 for DIB, alleging disability beginning 27 October 29, 2019. Administrative Transcript (“AT”) 26, 43. Plaintiff alleged she was unable to 28 work due to neck, hip, and tailbone pain. AT 195, 225. In a decision dated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.