Hurtado

Hurtado v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20241:22-cv-00206California721 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3

4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 ELIA GIL HURTADO, Case No. 1:22-cv-00206-NODJ-CDB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE

DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS

13 v. (Doc. 40) 14 FORD MOTOR COMPANY,

SEVEN-DAY DEADLINE

15 Defendant. 16 17

18 Defendant Ford Motor Company (Defendant) removed this action by Plaintiff Elia Gil Hurtado 19 (“Plaintiff”) from state court on February 17, 2022 – e.g., more than two years ago. 20 On January 11, 2024, the parties jointly executed a notice of settlement of the entire case and 21 requested that the Court vacate all remaining case management dates, including trial. (Doc. 34). The 22 Court vacated all case management dates and directed the parties to file dispositional documents 23 within 21 days. (Doc. 35) (citing Local Rule 160(b)). In its order, the Court made clear: “Absent 24 extraordinary circumstances, the Court disfavors retaining jurisdiction over the terms of or 25 performance under the parties’ settlement agreement.” Id. 26 When the parties failed to timely file dispositional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.