Hicks

(PC) Braley v. Hicks

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20241:23-cv-00206California727 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS D. BRALEY, No. 1:23-cv-00206-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, USCA No. 23-2349 v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON

R. HICKS, et al., APPEAL Defendants. (Doc. 26) 16 Thomas D. Braley, is a state prisoner, who sought to proceed in forma pauperis in this action. On June 20, 2023, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and ordered Plaintiff to pay the filing fee within 21 days. (Doc. 19.) The Court cautioned Plaintiff that “failure to pay the required fee as ordered will result in the dismissal of the action without prejudice.” (Id. at 2.) On July 31, 2023, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of and directed Plaintiff to pay the filing fee within 20 days. (Doc. 21 at 3.) Again, Plaintiff failed to pay the filing, and filed a second motion for reconsideration of the Court’s July 31, 2023 order. The Court denied Plaintiff’s second…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.