Flores

(PC) Murphy v. Flores

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20241:23-cv-00740California2,180 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MONRELL DONOVAN MURPHY, Case No. 1:23-cv-00740-NODJ-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

v. REVOKE PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA

PAUPERIS STATUS

FLORES, (ECF No. 20) Defendant.

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

16 I. Background Plaintiff Monrell Donovan Murphy (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was initiated on May 12, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP was granted the same date. (ECF Nos. 2, 5.) This action proceeds against Defendant D. Flores for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment and for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. (ECF Nos. 12, 15.) On February 14, 2024, Defendant filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(A) to revoke Plaintiff’s IFP status, together with a request for judicial notice. (ECF No. 20.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.