U.S. EEOC v. Elite Wireless Group, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 2:19-cv-02187-MCE-CKD
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Plaintiff, 13 v. 14
ELITE WIRELESS GROUP, INC., ET
15 AL., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Presently pending before the court is plaintiff U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity 19 Commission’s (“EEOC” or “plaintiff”) motion for default judgment against defendant Elite 20 Wireless Group, Inc. (“Elite” or “defendant”).1 (ECF No. 53.) The EEOC seeks relief in the 21 form of back pay, compensatory and punitive damages, and injunctive relief. (ECF No. 53-2.) 22 The EEOC alleges that Elite violated Title VII when the Charging Party’s2 supervisor 23 (“Store Manager”) sexually harassed her with offensive and unwanted comments once or twice a 24 day, four days a week, despite her objections—and that he sexually assaulted her in a hotel room 25 after Elite’s holiday party. (ECF No. 42 at ¶¶ 28-36.) 26
27 1 This motion is referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B),…