Bonta

(PC) Calderon v. Bonta

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20242:23-cv-01064California711 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 JUAN CALDERON, No. 2:23-cv-1064 WBS KJN 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. ORDER 15 ROB BONTA, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 ----oo0oo---- 19 Plaintiff filed this suit against Attorney General Rob 20 Bonta and Doe defendants asserting a litany of claims, including 21 the implantation of a chip to monitor his brain activity, sexual 22 experimentation, confiscation of his mail, improper disclosure of 23 his prison files, and denial of health care. (Docket No. 1.) 24 The Magistrate Judge dismissed the original complaint because (1) 25 defendant Bonta had absolute immunity for those claims against 26 him based on his official duties; (2) plaintiff had not pled 27 sufficient facts linking defendant Bonta to the alleged 28 deprivations; and (3) plaintiff’s claims were vague, conclusory, 1 and largely not believable. (Docket No. 6.) 2 Plaintiff then filed an amended complaint, which the 3 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.