Rubio

Rubio v. City of Visalia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20241:21-cv-00286California12,139 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMUNDO VICENTE RUBIO, Case No. 1:21-cv-00286-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

PLEADINGS

CITY OF VISALIA, et al., (ECF Nos. 66, 67, 68, 72, 74, 75) Defendants.

DEADLINE: 7 DAYS

14 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. Based on the moving, opposition, and reply papers, the operative complaint, the Court’s record, and the information presented by counsel at the hearing held on February 14, 2024, the Court issues the following order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. I. BACKGROUND On March 1, 2021, Plaintiff Raymundo Vicente Rubio (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action against the City of Visalia (“City”), Visalia Police Department Chief Jason Salazar, and Visalia Police Department Officers Marisa Burkdoll and William Hansen (collectively,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.