Rubio

Rubio v. City of Visalia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20241:21-cv-00286California12,139 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9 RAYMUNDO VICENTE RUBIO, Case No. 1:21-cv-00286-SAB

10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

11 v. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

PLEADINGS

12 CITY OF VISALIA, et al., (ECF Nos. 66, 67, 68, 72, 74, 75) 13 Defendants.

DEADLINE: 7 DAYS

14 15 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. Based 16 on the moving, opposition, and reply papers, the operative complaint, the Court’s record, and the 17 information presented by counsel at the hearing held on February 14, 2024, the Court issues the 18 following order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for judgment on the 19 pleadings. 20 I. 21 BACKGROUND 22 On March 1, 2021, Plaintiff Raymundo Vicente Rubio (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action 23 against the City of Visalia (“City”), Visalia Police Department Chief Jason Salazar, and Visalia 24 Police Department Officers Marisa Burkdoll and William Hansen (collectively,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.