Newsom

(PC) Coleman v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20242:90-cv-00520California3,860 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RALPH COLEMAN, et al., No. 2:90-cv-0520 KJM DB P 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. 14 | GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 On January 18, 2024, the parties filed a Joint Statement Regarding Tour Dispute. ECF 18 | No. 8110. The Joint Statement arises from a defense motion to lift a temporary stay of prison 19 | tours by retained defense experts the court imposed on July 28, 2023. See July 28, 2023 Order, 20 | ECF No. 7897. Defendants filed their motion to lift the stay on October 10, 2023. ECF No. 21 | 8005. On October 24, 2023, the court denied the motion without prejudice due to defendants’ 22 | failure to satisfy the court’s meet-and-confer requirements. October 24, 2023 Order, ECF No. 23 | 8029, at 5. The Joint Statement sets out the results of the meet-and-confer process the parties 24 | engaged in after the court’s October 24, 2023 order. The Joint Statement reflects one broad 25 | disagreement--whether the court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.