Quick
(PC) Jackson v. Quick
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CORNEL JACKSON, Case No.: 1:19-cv-01591-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE 13 v. (ECF Nos. 164–167) 14 J. QUICK, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Cornel Jackson (“Plaintiff”) is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 19 Plaintiff’s First and Sixth Amendment claims against Defendants Jason Quick, Elizabeth Alvarez, 20 Alvaro Rossette, James Followill, Lisette Lopez, Dominic Ramos, Hermina Marley, and Carmela Prudente (“Defendants”) based on allegations that Defendants regularly opened Plaintiff’s legal 21 mail outside of his presence and read Plaintiff’s legal mail related to criminal matters. (ECF Nos. 22 25, 30, 131). All parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 173). This 23 action is currently set for jury trial to begin on March 12, 2024. 24 On February 2, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion in limine.…