Campbell
(PC) Martinez v. Campbell
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD F. MARTINEZ, No. 1:22-cv-01549-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
v. TO THIS ACTION TAMMY CAMPBELL, et al. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF THE
Defendants. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A
COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF
16 (ECF No. 23)
18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983.
20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed October 24, 21 2023. 22 I.
SCREENING REQUIREMENT
24 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 25 governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The 26 Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally 27 “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or that…