Campbell

(PC) Martinez v. Campbell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20241:22-cv-01549California4,874 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RONALD F. MARTINEZ, No. 1:22-cv-01549-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

13 v. TO THIS ACTION 14 TAMMY CAMPBELL, et al. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF THE

15 Defendants. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF

16 (ECF No. 23) 17

18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 19

U.S.C. § 1983.

20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed October 24, 21 2023. 22 I. 23

SCREENING REQUIREMENT

24 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 25 governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The 26 Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally 27 “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.