Clingman

(PC) Benton v. Clingman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20242:22-cv-02275California491 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRUCE MILES BENTON, Case No. 2:22-cv-02275-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO

ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS

14 CLINGMAN, et al.¸ MATTER 15 Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 THAT THIS MATTER BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY

17 WITH COURT ORDERS 18 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

19 20 On December 1, 2023, I screened plaintiff’s amended complaint and notified him that 21 only some his claims were cognizable. ECF No. 29. I granted him thirty days to file either an 22 amended complaint or an advisement indicating his intent to proceed only with the identified 23 cognizable claims. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. 24 Accordingly, on January 24, 2024, I ordered him to show cause within twenty-one days 25 why this action should not be dismissed. ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.