Mejia

(PC) Bailey v. Mejia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20241:23-cv-01631California4,237 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYMOND BAILEY, Case No. 1:23-cv-01631-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

14 R. MEJIA, et al., DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

CLAIM, FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, AND

15 Defendants. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT

ORDER

16 (ECF Nos. 1, 9).

17

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY

18

DAYS

19 Plaintiff Raymond Bailey is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 20 this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 7). Plaintiff filed his 21 complaint on November 21, 2023, alleging that six prison correctional officers violated his 22 constitutional rights by not assuring his safety and not attending to his medical needs. 23 On January 22, 2024, the Court screened the complaint and concluded that Plaintiff failed 24 to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 9). The Court gave Plaintiff thirty days to file an 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.