Labbe'

Labbe' v. Dometic Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20242:20-cv-01975California2,858 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANE LABBE, et al., No. 2:20-CV-1975-DAD-DMC Plaintiffs, v. ORDER DOMETIC CORPORATION, Defendant. 16 Plaintiffs, who are proceeding with retained counsel, bring this civil action alleging products liability. The matter was removed from the Plumas County Superior Court under this Court’s diversity jurisdiction. See ECF No. 1. Pending before the Court are Defendant’s motions for a protective order and to quash a deposition subpoena. See ECF Nos. 114, 115. The parties have not filed a joint statement as required under Local Rule 251, but Plaintiffs have filed an opposition to both motions. See ECF Nos. 116, 117. Defendant has filed a reply. See ECF No. 118. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural History Following removal of this matter from the Plumas County Superior Court, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss as well as a motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.