(SS) Groom v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20242:23-cv-00174California1,198 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADAM TIMOTHY GROOM, No. 2:23-cv-00174 AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Adam Timothy Groom commenced this social security action on January 30, 19 2023. ECF Nos. 1-3.1 On September 28, 2023, the court granted the parties’ stipulation and 20 remanded the case for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). ECF 21 Nos. 21, 22. Presently pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for attorneys’ fees pursuant 22 to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). ECF No. 23. The Commissioner did not file any 23 statement in opposition. After considering the briefing and the applicable law, the court grants 24 plaintiff’s motion for EAJA fees. 25 //// 26

27 1 This case was referred to the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. L.R. 302(c)(15) and both parties voluntarily consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). ECF Nos. 7 and 15. 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.