(SS) Groom v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20242:23-cv-00174California1,198 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM TIMOTHY GROOM, No. 2:23-cv-00174 AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Adam Timothy Groom commenced this social security action on January 30, 2023. ECF Nos. 1-3. On September 28, 2023, the court granted the parties’ stipulation and remanded the case for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). ECF Nos. 21, 22. Presently pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for attorneys’ fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). ECF No. 23. The Commissioner did not file any statement in opposition. After considering the briefing and the applicable law, the court grants plaintiff’s motion for EAJA fees. ////

This case was referred to the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. L.R. 302(c)(15) and both parties voluntarily consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). ECF Nos. 7 and 15. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.