Schuyler

(HC) King v. Schuyler

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20242:23-cv-02360California722 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JESSE STEPHEN KING, No. 2:23-cv-2360 DB P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 CHARLES SCHUYLER, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner claims his right to due process was violated 19 during his 2021 parole hearing. 20 I. In Forma Pauperis 21 Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing 22 fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to 23 either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or 24 submit the appropriate filing fee. 25 II. Request for Transfer 26 Petitioner has requested that this action be transferred to San Diego because he is 27 presently housed at Richard J Donovan Correctional Center which is located in San Diego. (ECF 28 No. 12 at 1.) Petitioner further states that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.