Schuyler

(HC) King v. Schuyler

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20242:23-cv-02360California722 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSE STEPHEN KING, No. 2:23-cv-2360 DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER CHARLES SCHUYLER, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner claims his right to due process was violated during his 2021 parole hearing. I. In Forma Pauperis Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee. II. Request for Transfer Petitioner has requested that this action be transferred to San Diego because he is presently housed at Richard J Donovan Correctional Center which is located in San Diego. (ECF No. 12 at 1.) Petitioner further states that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.