Prieto Automotive, Inc. v. Volvo Car USA, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20241:21-cv-01085California193 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 PRIETO AUTOMOTIVE, INC., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01085-NODJ-EPG 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF

12 v. DEFENDANT RICHARD AARON ONLY 13 VOLVO CAR USA, LLC, et al., (ECF No. 73) 14 Defendants. 15 16 On March 7, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing all claims against only 17 | Defendant Richard Aaron with prejudice and with each party to bear their own costs and attorney 18 || fees. (ECF No. 73). In light of the parties’ stipulation, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A) □□□□ the case 19 | against only Defendant Richard Aaron has been dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear 20 | their own costs and attorney fees. See Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 21 | 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate Richard Aaron as a 22 | pending defendant on the docket. 73 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 | Dated: …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.