(SS) Gillit v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20242:22-cv-02050California4,943 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARIE GILLIT, No. 2:22-cv-2050 DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,1 15 16 Defendant. 17 18 This social security action was submitted to the court without oral argument for ruling on 19 plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment.2 20 Plaintiff argues that the ALJ’s step two finding, treatment of the medical opinion evidence, and 21 residual functional capacity determination were erroneous. For the reasons explained below, 22 //// 23 1 Martin O’Malley became the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on December 24 20, 2023. See https://blog.ssa.gov/martin-j-omalley-sworn-in-as-commissioner-of-social- security-administration/ (last visited by the court on February 21, 2024). Accordingly, Martin 25 O’Malley is substituted in as the defendant in this action. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (referring to the 26 “Commissioner’s Answer”); 20 C.F.R. § 422.210(d) (“the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.