Wilson

Wilson v. Whitestone Home Furnishings, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20242:23-cv-02552California2,332 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEREMY WILSON, No. 2:23-cv-02552-DAD-DB Plaintiff, v. SCHEDULING ORDER WHITESTONE HOME FURNISHINGS,

LLC,

15 Defendant.

17 Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court has reviewed the parties’ joint status report (Doc. No. 17) and has determined that the court need not “consult[] with the parties’ attorneys and any unrepresented parties at a scheduling conference,” before issuing a scheduling order in this case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(1)(B). Accordingly, the court vacates the initial scheduling conference set for March 12, 2024 and hereby issues this scheduling order. I. SERVICE OF PROCESS The named defendant Whitestone Home Furnishings, LLC has been served as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5. No further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). ///// II. JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES / AMENDMENT…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.