Harris

(HC) Barnes v. Harris

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20242:22-cv-02175California575 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTOINE DeSHAWN BARNES, No. 2:22-CV-2175-TLN-DMC-P 12 Petitioner,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

13 v. 14 KAMALA HARRIS, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of 18 habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s amended petition 19 for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 3. 20 Rule 4 of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases provides for summary 21 dismissal of a habeas petition “[i]f it plainly appears from the face of the petition and any exhibits 22 annexed to it that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” In the instant case, it 23 is plain that Petitioner is not entitled to federal habeas relief. 24 Petitioner names as respondents President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala 25 Harris. See ECF No. 3, pg. 1. According to Petitioner, he was convicted in October 2020 of 26 “false inmate assault” and “false resisting arrest.”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.