CDCR
(PC) Widmark v. CDCR
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID JOHN WIDMARK, Case No. 1:22-cv-00292-HBK (PC)
12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT
PREJUDICE1
13 v. 14 A. GOMEZ and M. MURO, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff David John Widmark, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons set forth below, the Court dismisses this 19 action without prejudice consistent with the Court’s Local Rules for Plaintiff’s failure to 20 prosecute this action. Specifically, Plaintiff failed to keep the Court apprised of a current address 21 and this action remains stagnant. 22 BACKGROUND 23 On November 28, 2023, Defendants filed a Motion to modify the discovery and 24 scheduling order, noting that Plaintiff was paroled on May 28, 2023 and had not provided an 25 updated mailing address permitting Defendants to engage in discovery. (Doc. No. 24). On 26 November 30, 2023, the Court granted the Motion and ordered Plaintiff to “promptly file a notice…