CDCR

(PC) Widmark v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20241:22-cv-00292California682 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID JOHN WIDMARK, Case No. 1:22-cv-00292-HBK (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE1

v. A. GOMEZ and M. MURO, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff David John Widmark, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons set forth below, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice consistent with the Court’s Local Rules for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action. Specifically, Plaintiff failed to keep the Court apprised of a current address and this action remains stagnant. BACKGROUND On November 28, 2023, Defendants filed a Motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order, noting that Plaintiff was paroled on May 28, 2023 and had not provided an updated mailing address permitting Defendants to engage in discovery. (Doc. No. 24). On November 30, 2023, the Court granted the Motion and ordered Plaintiff to “promptly file a notice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.