Khaira

Khaira v. Blue Cross of California, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20242:18-cv-02790California3,600 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and No. 2:18-cv-02790-MCE-JDP STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel.; 12 RAVINDER KHAIRA, M.D., an individual, 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiffs and Relator, 14 v. 15

BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.,

16 a California corporation, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 This lawsuit was originally filed under seal on October 18, 2018, pursuant to the 20 qui tam provisions of the federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729, et seq. (“FCA”), 21 and California’s False Claims Act, California Government Code §§ 12650, et seq. The 22 remaining Defendants are Blue Cross of California, Inc., Blue Cross of California 23 Partnership Plan, Inc., and Anthem, Inc. (together, the “Blue Cross Defendants”), which 24 are private health plans, along with executive employee David Mosher (“Mosher”) 25 (collectively with the Blue Cross Defendants, “Defendants”). The so-called “Relator” 26 plaintiff, Ravinder Khaira, M.D., (“Relator” or “Plaintiff”) is a board-certified pediatrician 27 who is the majority…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.