Gastelum

Gastelum v. Kohl's Department Stores Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20241:21-cv-01740California8,771 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No. 1: 21-cv-01740-JLT-BAM 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING (1) DEFENDANT’S

13 v. MOTION TO STRIKE NEW CLAIMS IN

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED

14 KOHL’S INC., COMPLAINT AND FOR DISMISSAL OF

ORIGINAL CLAIMS FOR FAILURE TO

15 Defendant. STATE A CLAIM, OR IN THE

ALTERNATIVE FOR SUMMARY

16 JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL

PURSUANT TO THE COURT’S POWER

17 TO SANCTION AND (2) PLAINTIFF’S

CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY

18 JUDGMENT 19 (Docs. 38, 40) 20 FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE 21 22 Currently pending before the Court is Defendant Kohl’s Inc.’s motion to strike, or in the 23 alternative, dismissing or granting judgment on Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum’s second amended 24 complaint. (Doc. 38.) Plaintiff filed an opposition and cross motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.