(SS) Miranda v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20242:23-cv-01811California427 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROSINA MIRANDA, No. 2:23-cv-01811-DAD-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING THE PARTIES’

STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD OF

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL

SECURITY, ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT AND COURT

COSTS Defendant. (Doc. No. 19)

17 18 On August 24, 2023, plaintiff Rosina Miranda filed this action seeking review of a final decision of defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Doc. No. 1.) On February 5, 2024, the matter was remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Doc. No. 17.) On March 7, 2024, the parties filed a stipulation with the court in which the parties agree that plaintiff shall be awarded attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $7,800.00 and court costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920 in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.