Diaz

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER NATHANIEL No. 2:20-cv-2261 KJM AC P

WASHINGTON,

12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER AND FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS 14 RALPH DIAZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion for an extension of time to 19 file a reply in support of his motion to compel and a motion for a temporary restraining order or 20 preliminary injunction. ECF Nos. 120, 121. 21 Although plaintiff has already filed objections to defendants’ opposition to his motions to 22 compel (ECF No. 119), plaintiff now seeks a thirty-to-sixty-day extension of time to file a 23 “proper reply” (ECF No. 120 at 1). He asserts that he has been in administrative segregation and 24 separated from his property since February 16, 2024, and therefore unable to properly reply. 25 Good cause appearing, the request will be granted and plaintiff will be afforded an additional 26 thirty days to file a reply in support of his motions to compel. 27 …