(PS) Prasad v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROSHNI PRASAD, Case No. 2:22-cv-01505-WBS-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND
BE GRANTED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT
14 WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, et MATTER JURISDICTION al., 15 ECF No. 24 Defendants. 16 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
17
18
19 20 Plaintiff, proceeding without counsel, filed claims for breach of contract against 21 defendants Wells Fargo Home Mortgage and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., on November 12, 2021, in 22 the Sacramento Superior Court. On August 25, 2022, defendants removed on the basis of 23 diversity jurisdiction, stating that plaintiff is a citizen of California, defendants are citizens of 24 South Dakota, and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Plaintiff filed a motion to 25 remand, arguing that her damages do not exceed the required amount in controversy. I will 26 recommend that plaintiff’s motion be granted…