(PS) Prasad v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20242:22-cv-01505California1,634 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROSHNI PRASAD, Case No. 2:22-cv-01505-WBS-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND

BE GRANTED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT

WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, et MATTER JURISDICTION al., ECF No. 24 Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

19 Plaintiff, proceeding without counsel, filed claims for breach of contract against defendants Wells Fargo Home Mortgage and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., on November 12, 2021, in the Sacramento Superior Court. On August 25, 2022, defendants removed on the basis of diversity jurisdiction, stating that plaintiff is a citizen of California, defendants are citizens of South Dakota, and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Plaintiff filed a motion to remand, arguing that her damages do not exceed the required amount in controversy. I will recommend that plaintiff’s motion be granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.