Tune
Washington v. Tune
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20241:24-cv-00036California1,127 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NATHANIEL WASHINGTON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00036-SAB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION
v. FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH
COURT ORDER FAILURE TO
BRAXTON TUNE, et al., PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO PAY
FILING FEE
Defendants.
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE
COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A
DISTRICT JUDGE
17 (ECF No. 3)
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
20 Nathaniel Washington (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action on January 8, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) On January 17, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to either submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, or, in the alternative, pay the $405.00 filing fee in this action within forty-five (45) days of the date of service of the order. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis nor paid the filing fee and the deadline to…