Tune

Washington v. Tune

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20241:24-cv-00036California1,127 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NATHANIEL WASHINGTON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00036-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION

v. FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

COURT ORDER FAILURE TO

BRAXTON TUNE, et al., PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO PAY

FILING FEE

Defendants.

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE

COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A

DISTRICT JUDGE

17 (ECF No. 3)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

20 Nathaniel Washington (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action on January 8, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) On January 17, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to either submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, or, in the alternative, pay the $405.00 filing fee in this action within forty-five (45) days of the date of service of the order. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis nor paid the filing fee and the deadline to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.