Tune

Washington v. Tune

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20241:24-cv-00036California1,127 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 NATHANIEL WASHINGTON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00036-SAB

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION

13 v. FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

COURT ORDER FAILURE TO

14 BRAXTON TUNE, et al., PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO PAY

FILING FEE

15 Defendants.

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE

16 COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A

DISTRICT JUDGE

17 (ECF No. 3) 18

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

19 DAYS

20 21 Nathaniel Washington (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action on 22 January 8, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) On January 17, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to either submit 23 an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, or, in the alternative, 24 pay the $405.00 filing fee in this action within forty-five (45) days of the date of service of the 25 order. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis nor paid 26 the filing fee and the deadline to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.