Tune
Washington v. Tune
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 NATHANIEL WASHINGTON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00036-SAB
12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION
13 v. FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH
COURT ORDER FAILURE TO
14 BRAXTON TUNE, et al., PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO PAY
FILING FEE
15 Defendants.
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE
16 COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A
DISTRICT JUDGE
17 (ECF No. 3) 18
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
19 DAYS
20 21 Nathaniel Washington (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action on 22 January 8, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) On January 17, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to either submit 23 an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, or, in the alternative, 24 pay the $405.00 filing fee in this action within forty-five (45) days of the date of service of the 25 order. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis nor paid 26 the filing fee and the deadline to…