Ehlers

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ZURI SANAKABISA YOUNG, No. 2:23-cv-2558 DJC AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 RYAN EHLERS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion to reconsider the 18 January 10, 2024 order denying his motions to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 19 9.) 20 Local Rule 230(j) requires that a motion for reconsideration state “what new or 21 different facts or circumstances are claimed to exist which did not exist or were not 22 shown upon such prior motion, or what other grounds exist for the motion; and . . . 23 why the facts or circumstances were not shown at the time of the prior motion.” L.R. 24 230(j)(3)-(4). Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration does not present any new or 25 different facts or circumstances that would demonstrate that he was in imminent 26 danger of serious physical injury at the time he filed the complaint. The exception 27 allowing prisoners to bring a civil action despite having three…