(HC) Vasko v. Amador County Jail (Sheriff)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEAN MICHAEL VASKO, No. 2:24-CV-0427-DMC-P 12 Petitioner, ORDER 13 v. and 14 AMADOR COUNTY JAIL, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s petition. See ECF 19 No. 1. 20 Rule 4 of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases provides for summary 21 dismissal of a habeas petition “[i]f it plainly appears from the face of the petition and any exhibits 22 annexed to it that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” In the instant case, it 23 is plain that Petitioner is not entitled to federal habeas relief. 24 As demonstrated on the face of the petition, Petitioner has not exhausted state 25 court remedies. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b), the exhaustion of available state remedies is required 26 before claims can be granted by…