(HC) Vasko v. Amador County Jail (Sheriff)

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20242:24-cv-00427California628 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEAN MICHAEL VASKO, No. 2:24-CV-0427-DMC-P Petitioner, ORDER v. and AMADOR COUNTY JAIL, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s petition. See ECF No. 1. Rule 4 of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases provides for summary dismissal of a habeas petition “[i]f it plainly appears from the face of the petition and any exhibits annexed to it that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” In the instant case, it is plain that Petitioner is not entitled to federal habeas relief. As demonstrated on the face of the petition, Petitioner has not exhausted state court remedies. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b), the exhaustion of available state remedies is required before claims can be granted by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.