(PC) Callins v. Mason

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20241:22-cv-00603California975 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLTON RAY CALLINS, No. 1:22-cv-00603-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

v. (ECF No. 42) C. MASON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 15, 2024, the Court issued an order to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to update his address of record. (ECF No. 42.) Plaintiff has failed to file a response and the time to do so has passed. (Id.) I. DISCUSSION Local Rule 183 provides, in pertinent part:

25 [a] party appearing in propria persona shall keep the Court and opposing parties advised as to his or her current address. If mail directed to a plaintiff in propria persona by the Clerk is returned by the U.S. Postal Service, and if such plaintiff fails to notify the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.