(PC) Grayson v. Sacramento County Main Jail

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LIQUAN S. GRAYSON, No. 2:23-CV-2859-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SACRAMENTO COUNTY MAIL JAIL, and et al., 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16

17 18 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 16, 2024, the Court directed Plaintiff to resolve the fee status for 20 this case within 30 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to resolve the fee status may result in 21 dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. 22 See Local Rule 110. To date, Plaintiff has not complied. 23 The Court must weigh five factors before imposing the harsh sanction of dismissal. 24 See Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); Malone v. U.S. Postal 25 Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987). Those factors are: (1) the public's interest in 26 expeditious resolution of…