Estate of Sherrano Stingley v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20242:23-cv-00255California3,455 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ESTATE OF SHERRANO STINGLEY, No. 2:23-cv-00255-TLN-AC DYMIN STINGLEY, S.S., and ANNETTE 12 HILBURN, 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER 14 v. 15 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Estate of Sherrano Stingley, Dymin Stingley, 19 S.S., and Annette Hilburn’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Reconsideration of the 20 magistrate judge’s January 17, 2024 Order. (ECF No. 43.) Also pending before the Court is 21 Defendants County of Sacramento, Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department, and Scott Jones’s 22 (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend. 23 (ECF Nos. 12, 34.) All motions have been fully briefed. For the reasons set forth below, the 24 Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration, GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion to amend, and 25 DENIES Defendants’ motion to dismiss as moot. 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2 This action arises from the death of Sherrano…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.