McGechie

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ESTELLE McGECHIE, No. 2:22-cv-01812-DJC-DB 12 Plaintiff,

13 v.

ORDER

14 ATOMOS LIMITED and ATOMOS,

INC.,

15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff brings the present suit against her former employer alleging 18 discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful termination. Before the Court are Defendant 19 Atomos Limited’s Motions to Dismiss for lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Forum Non 20 Conveniens in which Defendants assert that this Court cannot exercise personal 21 jurisdiction over Defendant, and that Australia is the proper forum for Plaintiff’s suit. 22 Defendant Atomos, Inc. has joined the Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens, 23 but has not challenged personal jurisdiction. For the reasons below, the Court 24 DENIES both motions and will retain jurisdiction over the case.1 25 //// 26 ////

27 1 Defendants have also filed a Motion to Stay pending decision on the Motions to Dismiss. (Mot. to Stay (ECF No. 34).) Because the Court has now resolved these motions, the Motion to Stay is DENIED as…