McGechie

McGechie v. Atomos Limited

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20242:22-cv-01812California6,169 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ESTELLE McGECHIE, No. 2:22-cv-01812-DJC-DB Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

ATOMOS LIMITED and ATOMOS,

INC.,

15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff brings the present suit against her former employer alleging discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful termination. Before the Court are Defendant Atomos Limited’s Motions to Dismiss for lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Forum Non Conveniens in which Defendants assert that this Court cannot exercise personal jurisdiction over Defendant, and that Australia is the proper forum for Plaintiff’s suit. Defendant Atomos, Inc. has joined the Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens, but has not challenged personal jurisdiction. For the reasons below, the Court DENIES both motions and will retain jurisdiction over the case.1 //// ////

1 Defendants have also filed a Motion to Stay pending decision on the Motions to Dismiss. (Mot. to Stay (ECF No. 34).) Because the Court has now resolved these motions, the Motion to Stay is DENIED as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.