Unknown

(HC) Grayson v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20242:23-cv-02861California567 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LIQUAN S. GRAYSON, No. 2:23-CV-2861-DMC-P Petitioner,

ORDER

v. and UNKNOWN,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 16, 2024, the Court dismissed Petitioner’s petition and directed Petitioner to file an amended petition within 30 days. The Court also directed Petitioner to resolve the fee status for this case within 30 days. Petitioner was warned that failure to file an amended petition may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. To date, Petitioner has not complied. The Court must weigh five factors before imposing the harsh sanction of dismissal. See Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); Malone v. U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987). Those factors are:…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.