Macomber

(HC) Zinman v. Macomber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20242:23-cv-02404California571 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUSTIN MARCUS ZINMAN, Case No. 2:23-cv-02404-JDP (HC) Petitioner, ORDER v. SCREENING THE PETITION AND

OFFERING LEAVE TO AMEND, AND

JEFF MACOMBER, DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO

SUBMIT MATERIALS

Respondent. ECF Nos. 1 & 10 16 17 18 19 20 Petitioner, a state prisoner, brings this action under section 2254 and alleges that his conviction is invalid because the state lacked jurisdiction over him because he is a “public entity” that is incorporated in Idaho. ECF No. 1 at 2. I have reviewed the petition and have determined that it fails to state a viable federal habeas claim. I will give petitioner one opportunity to amend before recommending this action be dismissed. I will also defer ruling on his motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 9, until he files his amended petition and deny his motion to submit materials. 28 The petition is before me for preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.