Macomber
(HC) Zinman v. Macomber
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUSTIN MARCUS ZINMAN, Case No. 2:23-cv-02404-JDP (HC) Petitioner, ORDER v. SCREENING THE PETITION AND
OFFERING LEAVE TO AMEND, AND
JEFF MACOMBER, DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO
SUBMIT MATERIALS
Respondent. ECF Nos. 1 & 10 16 17 18 19 20 Petitioner, a state prisoner, brings this action under section 2254 and alleges that his conviction is invalid because the state lacked jurisdiction over him because he is a “public entity” that is incorporated in Idaho. ECF No. 1 at 2. I have reviewed the petition and have determined that it fails to state a viable federal habeas claim. I will give petitioner one opportunity to amend before recommending this action be dismissed. I will also defer ruling on his motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 9, until he files his amended petition and deny his motion to submit materials. 28 The petition is before me for preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section…