Garza

(PC) Ballesteros v. Garza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20241:22-cv-01092California271 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BENJAMIN I. BALLESTEROS, Case No.: 1:22-cv-01092-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER RE: VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

v. (Doc. 12)

C/O GARZA, et al., ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE

COURT TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendants. AND TO CLOSE CASE

17 Plaintiff Benjamin I. Ballesteros filed a Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice on March 18 11, 2024.1 (Doc. 12.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), a “plaintiff may 19 dismiss an action without a court order by filing … a notice of dismissal before the opposing 20 party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). 21 The dismissal is without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B). Once a dismissal under Rule 22 41(a)(1) is properly filed, no order of the court is necessary to effectuate dismissal; the dismissal 23 is effective automatically. Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th 24 Cir. 1999). 25 // 26 // 27 Because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.