Peterson

(PC) Martinez v. Peterson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20242:21-cv-01779California973 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRED FELEKI MARTINEZ, Case No. 2:21-cv-01779-DAD-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER,

EXTENDING DISCOVERY, AND DENYING

14 PETERSON, PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO COMPEL AS

UNNECESSARY

15 Defendant. ECF Nos. 50, 56, 58, & 66 16

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

17

THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND

18 THE COMPLAINT BE DENIED AND

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

19 JUDGMENT BE DENIED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE TO REFILING

20 ECF Nos. 51 & 55 21

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

22 DAYS 23 24 Plaintiff brought this action in September 2021, ECF No. 1, and I issued a scheduling 25 order after screening the case, ECF No. 28. That order provided that discovery, including any 26 motions to compel, was to be completed by April 14, 2023. ECF No. 28 at 4-5. The schedule 27 also provided that any motion to amend the complaint must be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.