Peterson

(PC) Martinez v. Peterson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20242:21-cv-01779California973 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRED FELEKI MARTINEZ, Case No. 2:21-cv-01779-DAD-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER,

EXTENDING DISCOVERY, AND DENYING

PETERSON, PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO COMPEL AS

UNNECESSARY

Defendant. ECF Nos. 50, 56, 58, & 66

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND

THE COMPLAINT BE DENIED AND

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT BE DENIED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE TO REFILING

20 ECF Nos. 51 & 55

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS 23 Plaintiff brought this action in September 2021, ECF No. 1, and I issued a scheduling order after screening the case, ECF No. 28. That order provided that discovery, including any motions to compel, was to be completed by April 14, 2023. ECF No. 28 at 4-5. The schedule also provided that any motion to amend the complaint must be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.