(PC) Brookshire v. Sacramento County Main Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20242:23-cv-02000California1,152 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY JAMES BROOKSHIRE, Case No. 2:23-cv-02000-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. THAT PLAINTIFF INDICATE HIS

INTENT TO PROCEED ONLY WITH THE

SACRAMENTO COUNTY MAIN CLAIMS DEEMED COGNIZABLE IN JAIL, et al., THIS ORDER OR FILE ANOTHER AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DENYING Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR COURT ORDER

ECF Nos. 7 & 8 RESPONSE DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 19 20 Plaintiff, an inmate at the Sacramento County Jail, alleges that defendants violated his Fourteenth Amendment rights by failing to provide him with adequate medical care. ECF No. 7 at 3-9. After reviewing the complaint, I find that it states viable claims against defendants Jason Carver and Montano. It fails to state a viable claim against any other defendant. Plaintiff may either proceed only with his claims against Carver and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.