(PS) Iliya v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20242:22-cv-01305California1,876 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAUDA ILIYA, No. 2:22-cv-1305-KJM-KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. (ECF No. 25.) 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Presently before the court is plaintiff’s second motion for an extension of time on the 18 discovery deadlines in this case.1 (ECF No. 25.) Defendants oppose further extensions, and 19 plaintiff supplemented his arguments in a reply brief. (ECF Nos. 27, 28.) 20 For the reasons that follow, plaintiff’s request is denied. Thus, fact discovery is now 21 closed, and the parties shall proceed to the next phases of the case, as defined by the January 2023 22 pretrial scheduling order and as supplemented by the court’s September 15, 2023 minute order. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27

28 1 This case was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 1 Background 2 Plaintiff has brought this suit against defendants County of Sacramento; Anne Marie 3 Schubert (official capacity only);…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.