Rosen

(PC) Hood v. Rosen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20242:23-cv-01980California1,018 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALFRED FITZGERALD HOOD, Case No. 2:23-cv-01980-KJM-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. FINDING THAT THE AMENDED

COMPLAINT STATES A COGNIZABLE

14 ROSEN, et al., EXCESSIVE FORCE CLAIM AGAINST

DEFENDANTS MARA, PATTON, AND

15 Defendants. ANDERSON 16 DIRECTING TO PLAINTIFF TO

INDICATE HIS INTENT TO PROCEED

17 ONLY WITH THOSE CLAIMS OR DELAY

SERVING ANY DEFENDANT AND FILE

18 ANOTHER AMENDED COMPLAINT 19 ECF No. 13 20 RESPONSE DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 21 22 Plaintiff, a former inmate, alleges that defendants Anderson, Mara, Patton, Klein, and 23 Rossi, officers with the Roseville police department and, Rosen, a physician at the Sutter 24 Roseville Medical Center, violated his rights. Specifically, he alleges that the officer defendants 25 used excessive force against him during his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.