Rosen

(PC) Hood v. Rosen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20242:23-cv-01980California1,018 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALFRED FITZGERALD HOOD, Case No. 2:23-cv-01980-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. FINDING THAT THE AMENDED

COMPLAINT STATES A COGNIZABLE

ROSEN, et al., EXCESSIVE FORCE CLAIM AGAINST

DEFENDANTS MARA, PATTON, AND

Defendants. ANDERSON DIRECTING TO PLAINTIFF TO

INDICATE HIS INTENT TO PROCEED

ONLY WITH THOSE CLAIMS OR DELAY

SERVING ANY DEFENDANT AND FILE

ANOTHER AMENDED COMPLAINT ECF No. 13 RESPONSE DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 21 Plaintiff, a former inmate, alleges that defendants Anderson, Mara, Patton, Klein, and Rossi, officers with the Roseville police department and, Rosen, a physician at the Sutter Roseville Medical Center, violated his rights. Specifically, he alleges that the officer defendants used excessive force against him during his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.